<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IDF rules in Gaza allowed killing those without &#8216;means or intentions&#8217; to do harm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hybridstates.com/2010/02/idf-rules-of-engagement-in-gaza-allowed-killing-those-without-means-or-intentions-to-do-harm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hybridstates.com/2010/02/idf-rules-of-engagement-in-gaza-allowed-killing-those-without-means-or-intentions-to-do-harm/</link>
	<description>Between Dome of the Rock and a Hard Place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:50:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What the Goldstone op-ed doesn’t say &#124; Flag in Distress</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridstates.com/2010/02/idf-rules-of-engagement-in-gaza-allowed-killing-those-without-means-or-intentions-to-do-harm/comment-page-1/#comment-4926</link>
		<dc:creator>What the Goldstone op-ed doesn’t say &#124; Flag in Distress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 14:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hybridstates.com/?p=1474#comment-4926</guid>
		<description>[...] and officers’ statements. For example, many people have commented before about how the IDF “rewrote the rules of war for Gaza,” in particular by getting rid of “the longstanding principle of military conduct known as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and officers’ statements. For example, many people have commented before about how the IDF “rewrote the rules of war for Gaza,” in particular by getting rid of “the longstanding principle of military conduct known as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What the Goldstone op-ed doesn’t say &#124; Occupied Palestine &#124; فلسطين</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridstates.com/2010/02/idf-rules-of-engagement-in-gaza-allowed-killing-those-without-means-or-intentions-to-do-harm/comment-page-1/#comment-4905</link>
		<dc:creator>What the Goldstone op-ed doesn’t say &#124; Occupied Palestine &#124; فلسطين</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 11:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hybridstates.com/?p=1474#comment-4905</guid>
		<description>[...] soldiers’ and officers’ statements.  For example, many people have commented before about how the IDF “rewrote the rules of war for Gaza”, in particular by getting rid of “the longstanding principle of military conduct known as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] soldiers’ and officers’ statements.  For example, many people have commented before about how the IDF “rewrote the rules of war for Gaza”, in particular by getting rid of “the longstanding principle of military conduct known as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reconsidering Goldstone&#8217;s reconsideration</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridstates.com/2010/02/idf-rules-of-engagement-in-gaza-allowed-killing-those-without-means-or-intentions-to-do-harm/comment-page-1/#comment-4865</link>
		<dc:creator>Reconsidering Goldstone&#8217;s reconsideration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 21:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hybridstates.com/?p=1474#comment-4865</guid>
		<description>[...] and officers&#8217; statements.  For example, many people have commented before about how the IDF &#8220;rewrote the rules of war for Gaza&#8221;, in particular by getting rid of &#8220;the longstanding principle of military conduct known as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and officers&#8217; statements.  For example, many people have commented before about how the IDF &#8220;rewrote the rules of war for Gaza&#8221;, in particular by getting rid of &#8220;the longstanding principle of military conduct known as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What the Goldstone op-ed doesn’t say</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridstates.com/2010/02/idf-rules-of-engagement-in-gaza-allowed-killing-those-without-means-or-intentions-to-do-harm/comment-page-1/#comment-4864</link>
		<dc:creator>What the Goldstone op-ed doesn’t say</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 21:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hybridstates.com/?p=1474#comment-4864</guid>
		<description>[...] and officers’ statements.&#160; For example, many people have commented before about how&#160;the IDF “rewrote the rules of war for Gaza”, in particular by getting rid of “the longstanding principle of military conduct known as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and officers’ statements.&#160; For example, many people have commented before about how&#160;the IDF “rewrote the rules of war for Gaza”, in particular by getting rid of “the longstanding principle of military conduct known as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridstates.com/2010/02/idf-rules-of-engagement-in-gaza-allowed-killing-those-without-means-or-intentions-to-do-harm/comment-page-1/#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hybridstates.com/?p=1474#comment-407</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by hybridstates: IDF rules of engagement in Gaza allowed killing those without &#039;means or intentions&#039; to do harm - http://bit.ly/90ww8T #israel #palestine...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by hybridstates: IDF rules of engagement in Gaza allowed killing those without &#8216;means or intentions&#8217; to do harm &#8211; <a href="http://bit.ly/90ww8T" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/90ww8T</a> #israel #palestine&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philipblue</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridstates.com/2010/02/idf-rules-of-engagement-in-gaza-allowed-killing-those-without-means-or-intentions-to-do-harm/comment-page-1/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>philipblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hybridstates.com/?p=1474#comment-383</guid>
		<description>Slightl lame response can be found here:

http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/lorna-fitzsimons-israel-faces-a-battle-for-credibility-but-its-winnable-1888792.html

Though to her credit, the argument that Israel needs to show the public its sincerity in trying to make peace is true. It&#039;s just that, from the way it seems, no such sincerity exists as yet. Though here&#039;s hoping that we won&#039;t be kept waiting too long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slightl lame response can be found here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/lorna-fitzsimons-israel-faces-a-battle-for-credibility-but-its-winnable-1888792.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/lorna-fitzsimons-israel-faces-a-battle-for-credibility-but-its-winnable-1888792.html</a></p>
<p>Though to her credit, the argument that Israel needs to show the public its sincerity in trying to make peace is true. It&#8217;s just that, from the way it seems, no such sincerity exists as yet. Though here&#8217;s hoping that we won&#8217;t be kept waiting too long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

